In United States, when such a violent demonstration occurs, police blocks the roads and national guards are put in. This case is considered an emergency situation that exceeds the ability of police to handle. When NewOrleans became chaos, national guards was put in and they fired live shots. When there was LA riot, police was pulled back and national guards was called in to restore the order. Of course, various law suits follows, but usually government decision of using national guards is justifed by showing 1. legitimate government interest and 2. no less restrictive alternative available. In LA riot case, government has the public safety interest that has to be pretected and restored and police was unable to achieve that goal and using national guard was the last option that government invoked. By showing those, government was justified, thus not responsible for the harm the demonstrator may have suffered. So, if you want to demonstrate your views in United States, you must do it legally. Because each individual has duty to obey the law as a member of the society they belong to. Sorry if I made a mess.
´ñ±Û [20]
³²±¹Çö | 2006-12-08 | Ãßõ 0
CHAOS | 2006-12-08 | ̵̧ 0
mk42 | 2006-12-07 | ̵̧ 0
KF-22 | 2006-12-07 | ̵̧ 0
¾È´ö·¡ | 2006-12-06 | Ãßõ 0
±è¹Ú»ç | 2006-12-06 | Ãßõ 0
Â÷ÄÆÎÀÌ | 2006-12-06 | Ãßõ 0
dkndr | 2006-12-06 | ̵̧ 0
Spetsnaz | 2006-12-06 | ̵̧ 0
Á¶¾¾ | 2006-12-06 | Ãßõ 0
Ä¡Å佺 | 2006-12-06 | Ãßõ 0
judge | 2006-12-06 | ̵̧ 0
À°»ç°¡¾ßÁö | 2006-12-06 | Ãßõ 0
±Øµ¿ÇÔ´ë | 2006-12-06 | Ãßõ 0
´©·îÁö¸À | 2006-12-06 | Ãßõ 0
reopard2 | 2006-12-06 | ̵̧ 0
mk42 | 2006-12-06 | ̵̧ 0
¾È´ö·¡ | 2006-12-06 | Ãßõ 0
¾È´ö·¡ | 2006-12-06 | Ãßõ 0
Raye | 2006-12-06 | ̵̧ 0