¿µ±¹ ½ÅÇü Ç׸ð ÇÁ·ÎÁ§Æ® Ãë¼Ò À§±â

mkhwang | 2007-02-06 05:14:10

Á¶È¸ 4180 | Ãßõ 1 | ´Ù¿î·Îµå 0

±Û ÀÛ¼º¿¡ ´ëÇÑ °£·«ÇÑ Á¤º¸¸¦ Á¦°ø

Å©°Ô | ÀÛ°Ô

ÇÁ¸°Æ®

¿µ±¹Á¤ºÎ°¡ »¡¸® Çù»óÀ» ¸¶¹«¸®ÁþÁö ¸øÇÏ¸é ½ÅÇü Ç׸ð ÇÁ·ÎÁ§Æ®°¡ Ãë¼Ò µÉ ¼ö ÀÖ´Ù°í ¿µ±¹ ¹æ»ê¾÷°è°¡ °æ°í¸¦ Çϴ±º¿ä. °£´Ü ¹ø¿ªÀÔ´Ï´Ù. ¸¸ÀÏ ½ÅÇüÇ׸𰡠Á¦¶§ Ã뿪ÇÏÁö ¸øÇÑ´Ù¸é ¿µ±¹ Çرº·Â Åõ»ç¿¡µµ ¹®Á¦°¡ ¿À°Ú±º¿ä.


Executive Warns British Carriers May Be Canceled (Ç׸ð°ÇÁ¶ Ãë¼Ò °æ°í)

By ANDREW CHUTER, LONDON


The industry executive leading an alliance of British companies vying for a contract to build two 65,000-metric-ton aircraft carriers for the Royal Navy has urged a swift conclusion to negotiations, or the project may never happen. (¿µ ¹æ»ê ¿¬ÇÕü´Â Çرº°úÀÇ Çù»óÀÌ »¡¸® ¸¶¹«¸® µÇÁö ¸øÇÒ°æ¿ì 6¸¸ 5õÅæ±Þ ½ÅÇü Ç׸ð ÀÚü°¡ °ÇÁ¶µÇÁö ¾ÊÀ» ¼ö ÀÕ´Ù°í ¸»Çß´Ù)

It was only a throwaway remark at the end of a conference, but Peter McIntosh, the senior executive who delivered it, emphasized the possible consequences of government and industry not quickly agreeing on a price to build the biggest warships ever planned for the Royal Navy. (¿¬ÇÕü¸¦ À̲ø°í ÀÖ´Â ÇÇÅÍ ¸ßŲÅ佬 »çÀåÀº Á¤ºÎ¿ÍÀÇ °¡°ÝÇù»óÀÌ ¿©ÀÇÄ¡ ¾ÊÀ» °æ¿ì ±×·² ¼ö ÀÖ´Ù´Â ¹ß¾ðÀ» Çß´Ù)

McIntosh, giving an update on the program, told an audience Jan. 24 that if things aren¡¯t hurried up, he is in danger of being part of a project that would go on record as the longest program ¡°never to happen.¡±
He spoke at a closed forum here, where Britain¡¯s leading maritime industry executives and Ministry of Defence officials were discussing the future shape of the fleet. Some of his remarks about the high-profile CVF carrier program have leaked out. McIntosh was on holiday last week and not available for comment.(±×´Â 1¿ù 24ÀÏ ÇØ¾ç ¾÷ü¿Í ±¹¹æºÎ °ü°èÀÚµéÀÌ ¸ðÀÎ ÀÚ¸®¿¡¼­ Çù»óÀÌ »¡¸® ¸¶¹«¸® µÇÁö ¾ÊÀ» °æ¿ì °¡Àå ±ä ½Ã°£¸¸ Àâ¾Æ¸Ô°í Ãë¼ÒµÈ ÇÁ·Î±×·¥ÀÌ µÉ ¼ö ÀÖ´Ù´Â ¹ß¾ðÀ» ÇÏ¿´À½)

The warning to get on with the project follows concerns recently voiced by Adm. Sir Alan West, former First Sea Lord, that some in government wanted to abandon the program and use the cash on other projects. Lord Drayson, defense procurement minister, quashed that speculation Jan. 18 when answering questions in the House of Lords. An MoD spokesman said ministry officials are ¡°redoubling our efforts to get the carrier deal closed. We are still trying to close the gap on the price.¡±
(Á¤ºÎ ÀϺο¡¼­´Â Ç׸ð °ÇÁ¶¸¦ Ãë¼ÒÇÏ°í ´Ù¸¥ °÷¿¡ ÀÚ±ÝÀ» ¾²ÀÚ´Â ¸»ÀÌ µ¹±âµµ ÇÏÁö¸¸ Á¶´ÞÀå°üÀº ÀÇȸ¿¡¼­ °¡°ÝÇù»óÀ» ¸¶¹«¸®Çϱâ À§ÇØ ³ë·ÂÇÏ°í ÀÖ´Ù´Â ¸»·Î À̸¦ ºÎÀÎ)

Nevertheless, industry and government officials continue to talk about opposition to the plans by sections of government, and McIntosh¡¯s remarks add weight to suggestions the carriers might face a problem. Drayson has instructed his officials to try to reach agreement with industry by April 6, with the prospect of a deal going forward for approval in May or June, government sources said. Drayson has previously linked signing the carrier deal with his demands that industry restructure as part of his Defence Industrial Strategy.
(Ç׸ð°èȹ¿¡ ¹Ý´ëÇÏ´Â Á¤ºÎ°ü°èÀڵ鵵 ÀÖ´Â »óȲ¿¡¼­ ¹æ»ê¾÷üÀÇ °ÇÁ¶ Ãë¼Ò °æ°í ¹ß¾ðÀº ¾î´À Á¤µµÀÇ ¹«°Ô°¡ ÀÖÀ½. ÇÑÆí Á¶´ÞûÀº ¿ÃÇØ 4¿ù 6ÀϱîÁö °¡°Ý Çù»óÀ» ¸¶¹«¸®ÇÏ°í 5¿ùÀ̳ª 6¿ù Âë ½ÂÀÎÀÌ ³ª´Â °ÍÀ» ¸ñÇ¥·Î ³ë·Â ÁßÀÓ)

VT¡¯s McIntosh is heading the joint MoD-industry alliance of BAE Systems, Babcock, KBR, VT and Thales UK that was put together to design and build the carriers.
(±¹¹æºÎ¿Í ´õºÒ¾î BAE Systems, Babcock, KBR, VT ±×¸®°í Thales UK°¡ ¿¬ÇÕÇØ Ç׸𸦠µðÀÚÀÎÇÏ°í °ÇÁ¶Çϱâ·Î µÇ¾î ÀÖ´Ù)

U.S. firm KBR, though, is set to be ejected from the consortium by midyear when the current assessment phase of the work ends. KBR was appointed in the face of stiff opposition from BAE to undertake program integration and various support roles. Some executives here say KBR¡¯s removal is specific to the carrier and not related to the breakdown in relations with the MoD after KBR parent Halliburton ignored government requests not to go ahead with a planned spin-off of KBR until the British had done a financial investigation of the move. Others are not so sure.
(¹Ì±¹ ±â¾÷ÀÎ KBRÀº ±Ý³â Áß¹ÝÂë BAE¿¡ ¹Ð·Á ¿¬ÇÕü¿¡¼­ ¹Ð·Á³ª°Ô µÇ¾ú´Ù. ÀϺΠ°ü°èÀÚµéÀº ¿µ±¹Á¤ºÎ°¡ KBRÀÇ ¸ðȸ»çÀÎ ÇÒ¸®¹öÆ°°ú ¹®Á¦°¡ À־ ±×·±°Ç ¾Æ´Ï¶ó°ï ÇÏÁö¸¸ ±×·² °¡´É¼ºµµ ÀÖ´Ù. ¿µ±¹Á¤ºÎ°¡ ÁøÇàÁßÀÌ´ø À繫Á¶»ç°¡ ³¡³¯¶§±îÁö ÀÚȸ»çÀÇ ÁÖ½ÄÀ» óºÐÇÏÁö ¸»¶ó´Â ¿äûÀ» ÇÒ¸®¹öÆ°ÀÌ ¹«½ÃÇß´Ù)

The MoD already is said to be encouraging KBR to sell its large stake in DML, the British-based nuclear submarine refit and refueling yard, as punishment. Talks are under way with BAE and others.
McIntosh was complimentary about KBR¡¯s role to date, saying its project management experience was valuable to have on board the alliance. •
(¿µ±¹Á¤ºÎ´Â KBRÀÌ °¡Áö°í ÀÖ´Â ¿øÀÚ·Â Àá¼öÇÔ Á¤ºñ ¹× ±ÞÀ¯È¸»çÀÎ DMLÀ» Æȶó°í Á¾¿ëÇÏ°í ÀÖÀ¸¸ç ÀÌ´Â ¿µ±¹Á¤ºÎÀÇ ¿äûÀ» °ÅÀýÇѵ¥ ´ëÇÑ Ã³¹ú·Î º¸ÀδÙ. ÀÌ¹Ì BAE¿Í ´Ù¸¥ ȸ»çµé°úÀÇ Çù»óÀÌ ÁøÇàµÇ°í ÀÖ´Â »óȲÀÌ´Ù)


ÆäÀ̽ººÏ Æ®À§ÅÍ

½ºÅ©·¦

ÀÌÀü ´ÙÀ½

¸ñ·Ï

´ñ±Û [6]

ÀÌÀü 1 ´ÙÀ½

·Î±×ÀÎ | ȸ¿ø°¡ÀÔ

µî·ÏÇϱâ

Top